What is the difference between these headers?
Content-Type: application/javascript
Content-Type: application/x-javascript
Content-Type: text/javascript
Which one is best and why?
Please do not say they are identical - if they were identical there would not have been three of them. I know both work - but I would like to know the difference.
text/javascript
is obsolete, and application/x-javascript
was experimental (hence the x-
prefix) for a transitional period until application/javascript
could be standardised.
You should use application/javascript
. This is documented in the RFC.
As far a browsers are concerned, there is no difference (at least in HTTP headers). This was just a change so that the text/*
and application/*
MIME type groups had a consistent meaning where possible. (text/*
MIME types are intended for human readable content, JavaScript is not designed to directly convey meaning to humans).
Note that using application/javascript
in the type
attribute of a script element will cause the script to be ignored (as being in an unknown language) in some older browsers. Either continue to use text/javascript
there or omit the attribute entirely (which is permitted in HTML 5).
This isn't a problem in HTTP headers as browsers universally (as far as I'm aware) either ignore the HTTP content-type of scripts entirely, or are modern enough to recognise application/javascript
.