I'm curious if passing setState
as a prop to a child (dumb component) is violating any "best practices" or will affect optimization.
Here is an example where I have the parent container passing state
and setState
to two child components, where the child components will call the setState
function.
I do not explicitly call setState
in the children, they reference a service to handle the correct setting of state properties.
export default function Dashboard() {
const [state, setState] = useState({
events: {},
filters: [],
allEvents: [],
historical: false,
});
return (
<Grid>
<Row>
<Col>
<EventsFilter
state={state}
setState={setState}
/>
<EventsTable
state={state}
setState={setState}
/>
</Col>
</Row>
</Grid>
)
}
Example of dashboard setState service
function actions(setState) {
const set = setState;
return function () {
return ({
setEvents: (events) => set((prev) => ({
...prev,
events,
})),
setAllEvents: (allEvents) => set((prev) => ({
...prev,
allEvents,
})),
setFilters: (name, value) => set((prev) =>
({
...prev,
filters
})
),
})
}
}
So far I haven't noticed any state issues.
It is ok to call a function from the child to set the state of the parent, however there is a couple things to keep in mind when doing this
1) I hope you aren't actually calling the function as "setState" as generally you don't want to this, from a purely syntactical standpoint
2) Realize that you are affecting the state of the parent and not the child when calling the function from within the child. This could lead to some funky results if you lose track of what data you are intending to manipulate and from where.