Angular 1 does not accept onchange()
event, it's only accepts ng-change()
event.
Angular 2, on the other hand, accepts both (change)
and (ngModelChange)
events, which both seems to be doing the same thing.
What's the difference?
which one is best for performance?
ngModelChange:
<input type="text" pInputText class="ui-widget ui-text"
(ngModelChange)="clearFilter()" placeholder="Find"/>
vs change:
<input type="text" pInputText class="ui-widget ui-text"
(change)="clearFilter()" placeholder="Find"/>
(change)
event bound to classical input change event.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Events/change
You can use (change) event even if you don't have a model at your input as
<input (change)="somethingChanged()">
(ngModelChange)
is the @Output
of ngModel directive. It fires when the model changes. You cannot use this event without ngModel directive.
https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/packages/forms/src/directives/ng_model.ts#L124
As you discover more in the source code, (ngModelChange)
emits the new value.
https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/packages/forms/src/directives/ng_model.ts#L169
So it means you have ability of such usage:
<input (ngModelChange)="modelChanged($event)">
modelChanged(newObj) {
// do something with new value
}
Basically, it seems like there is no big difference between two, but ngModel
events gains the power when you use [ngValue]
.
<select [(ngModel)]="data" (ngModelChange)="dataChanged($event)" name="data">
<option *ngFor="let currentData of allData" [ngValue]="currentData">
{{data.name}}
</option>
</select>
dataChanged(newObj) {
// here comes the object as parameter
}
assume you try the same thing without "ngModel
things"
<select (change)="changed($event)">
<option *ngFor="let currentData of allData" [value]="currentData.id">
{{data.name}}
</option>
</select>
changed(e){
// event comes as parameter, you'll have to find selectedData manually
// by using e.target.data
}