I have a simple class with a single method exec(arg1,..,argn)
and I want to have a number of alias methods which call exec
with predefined argument values (e.g. exec_sync = exec.bind(this, true)
).
The following does the trick:
class Executor {
constructor() {
this.exec_sync = this.exec.bind(this, true);
}
exec(sync, cmd, args/* ... */) {
// impl
}
}
But I don't know if this is a good idea or if this is idiomatic to ES6.
UDATE:
In a real-life example I have two nested loops with respectively 3 and 4 loops, which are used to dynamically add a total number of 12 alias methods to the class. It would be a cumbersome task to explicitly define the alias methods when you actually can take advantage of JS being a prototype-based programming language.
UPDATE 2 - EXAMPLE:
Suppose we have have a simple HTTP client with a method request(method, body)
and we want to provide alias methods for GET
, PUT
, etc. It would look something like the following:
class HTTP {
constructor() {
['GET', 'PUT', 'POST', 'DEL'].forEach((method) => {
this[method] = this.request.bind(this, method);
}, this);
}
request(method, body) {
// execute the HTTP request
}
}
Your solution is fine, though it'll be better to create all those methods once on a prototype
level:
['GET', 'PUT', 'POST', 'DEL'].forEach((method) => {
Executor.prototype[method] = function (body) {
return this.request(method, body)
}
})
prototype
approach is slightly faster, because this code is executed only once, while constructor code is executed every time new instance is created.
Another advantage of prototype
over constructor
is that its compatible with classes inheritance. So, if you'll extend your class later nothing will break even if you'll redefine any of those methods.
By the way, you can use require('http').METHODS
or methods
package instead of hard-coded array of HTTP verbs here.