I'm writing my first Yeoman generator, which prompts the user for various inputs and conditionally creates files based on their responses. I need to be able to call a subroutine (could be a Yeoman sub-generator) based on user input, and pass arguments to it.
The reason I want to use named functions (which are not automatically run) is that sometimes the user's response should invoke a number of functions combined, and sometimes the function should be run alone.
What I have tried:
I figured sub-generators were the way to go, since I'm creating sets of files only if the user requests them. But I'm having trouble calling them conditionally and passing them the user-supplied input. I've tried using hookFor
, but I get the assertion error: hookFor must be used within the constructor only
. (Because I don't want it to be run by default, I'm calling the sub-generator from my this.prompt(prompts, function (props)
).
The question:
How do I call a routine only if the user requests it (via a prompt), and pass that routine some user-supplied information?
If you're kind enough to answer, please don't assume that I've tried something obvious ;-).
Let's consider you have a generator generator-blog
(BlogGenerator) with two sub generators (blog-server and blog-client):
app\index.js
client\index.js
server\index.js
So when you run yo blog
you what to ask the user for some options and run (optionally) sub generators, right?
To run a subgenerator you need to call this.invoke("generator_namespace", {options: {}})
.
The second argument we passed can have options
field - it's options object which will be passed to the generator.
In app\index.js:
BlogGenerator.prototype.askFor = function askFor() {
var cb = this.async();
// have Yeoman greet the user.
console.log(this.yeoman);
var prompts = [{
name: 'appName',
message: 'Enter your app name',
default: 'MyBlog'
}, {
type: 'confirm',
name: 'createServer',
message: 'Would you like to create server project?',
default: true
}, {
type: 'confirm',
name: 'createClient',
message: 'Whould you like to create client project?',
default: true
}];
this.prompt(prompts, function (props) {
this.appName = props.appName;
this.createServer = props.createServer;
this.createClient = props.createClient;
cb();
}.bind(this));
}
BlogGenerator.prototype.main = function app() {
if (this.createClient) {
// Here: we'are calling the nested generator (via 'invoke' with options)
this.invoke("blog:client", {options: {nested: true, appName: this.appName}});
}
if (this.createServer) {
this.invoke("blog:server", {options: {nested: true, appName: this.appName}});
}
};
In client\index.js:
var BlogGenerator = module.exports = function BlogGenerator(args, options, config) {
var that = this;
yeoman.Base.apply(this, arguments);
// in this.options we have the object passed to 'invoke' in app/index.js:
this.appName = that.options.appName;
this.nested = that.options.nested;
};
BlogGenerator .prototype.askFor = function askFor() {
var cb = this.async();
if (!this.options.nested) {
console.log(this.yeoman);
}
}
UPDATE 2015-12-21:
Using invoke
is deprecated now and should be replaced with composeWith
. But it's not as easy as it could be. The main difference between invoke
and composeWith
is that now you have no ability to control subgenerators. You could only declare using them.
Here's how main
method from above should look like:
BlogGenerator.prototype.main = function app() {
if (this.createClient) {
this.composeWith("blog:client", {
options: {
nested: true,
appName: this.appName
}
}, {
local: require.resolve("./../client")
});
}
if (this.createServer) {
this.composeWith("blog:server", {
options: {
nested: true,
appName: this.appName
}
}, {
local: require.resolve("./../server")
});
}
};
Also I removed replaced yeoman.generators.Base
with yeoman.Base
.