Perform .join on value in array of objects

jackweirdy picture jackweirdy · May 17, 2013 · Viewed 230.8k times · Source

If I have an array of strings, I can use the .join() method to get a single string, with each element separated by commas, like so:

["Joe", "Kevin", "Peter"].join(", ") // => "Joe, Kevin, Peter"

I have an array of objects, and I’d like to perform a similar operation on a value held within it; so from

[
  {name: "Joe", age: 22},
  {name: "Kevin", age: 24},
  {name: "Peter", age: 21}
]

perform the join method only on the name attribute, to achieve the same output as before.

Currently I have the following function:

function joinObj(a, attr){
  var out = [];

  for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++){
    out.push(a[i][attr]);
  }

  return out.join(", ");
}

There’s nothing wrong with that code, it works, but all of a sudden I’ve gone from a simple, succinct line of code to a very imperative function. Is there a more succinct, ideally more functional way of writing this?

Answer

Benjamin Gruenbaum picture Benjamin Gruenbaum · May 17, 2013

If you want to map objects to something (in this case a property). I think Array.prototype.map is what you're looking for if you want to code functionally.

[
  {name: "Joe", age: 22},
  {name: "Kevin", age: 24},
  {name: "Peter", age: 21}
].map(function(elem){
    return elem.name;
}).join(",");

In modern JavaScript:

[
  {name: "Joe", age: 22},
  {name: "Kevin", age: 24},
  {name: "Peter", age: 21}
].map(e => e.name).join(",");

(fiddle)

If you want to support older browsers, that are not ES5 compliant you can shim it (there is a polyfill on the MDN page above). Another alternative would be to use underscorejs's pluck method:

var users = [
      {name: "Joe", age: 22},
      {name: "Kevin", age: 24},
      {name: "Peter", age: 21}
    ];
var result = _.pluck(users,'name').join(",")