I've heard this quite a few times. Are JavaScript loops really faster when counting backward? If so, why? I've seen a few test suite examples showing that reversed loops are quicker, but I can't find any explanation as to why!
I'm assuming it's because the loop no longer has to evaluate a property each time it checks to see if it's finished and it just checks against the final numeric value.
I.e.
for (var i = count - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
// count is only evaluated once and then the comparison is always on 0.
}
It's not that i--
is faster than i++
. Actually, they're both equally fast.
What takes time in ascending loops is evaluating, for each i
, the size of your array. In this loop:
for(var i = array.length; i--;)
You evaluate .length
only once, when you declare i
, whereas for this loop
for(var i = 1; i <= array.length; i++)
you evaluate .length
each time you increment i
, when you check if i <= array.length
.
In most cases you shouldn't even worry about this kind of optimization.