I'm trying to use the HTML5 draggable API (though I realize it has its problems). So far, the only showstopper I've encountered is that I can't figure out a way to determine what is being dragged when a dragover
or dragenter
event fires:
el.addEventListener('dragenter', function(e) {
// what is the draggable element?
});
I realize I could assume that it's the last element to fire a dragstart
event, but... multitouch. I've also tried using e.dataTransfer.setData
from the dragstart
to attach a unique identifier, but apparently that data is inaccessible from dragover
/dragenter
:
This data will only be available once a drop occurs during the drop event.
So, any ideas?
Update: As of this writing, HTML5 drag-and-drop does not appear to be implemented in any major mobile browser, making the point about multitouch moot in practice. However, I'd like a solution that's guaranteed to work across any implementation of the spec, which does not appear to preclude multiple elements from being dragged simultaneously.
I've posted a working solution below, but it's an ugly hack. I'm still hoping for a better answer.
I wanted to add a very clear answer here so that it was obvious to everyone who wanders past here. It's been said several times in other answers, but here it is, as clear as I can make it:
dragover
DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHTS to see the data in the drag event.This information is only available during the DRAG_START and DRAG_END (drop).
The issue is it's not obvious at all and maddening until you happen to read deeply enough on the spec or places like here.
WORK-AROUND:
As a possible work-around I have added special keys to the DataTransfer object and tested those. For example, to improve efficiency I wanted to look up some "drop target" rules when my drag started instead of every time a "drag over" occurred. To do this I added keys identifying each rule onto the dataTransfer object and tested those with "contains".
ev.originalEvent.dataTransfer.types.includes("allow_drop_in_non_folders")
And things like that. To be clear, that "includes" is not a magic bullet and can become a performance concern itself. Take care to understand your usage and scenarios.