I've seen the wildcard used before to mean any object - but recently saw a use of:
<? extends Object>
Since all objects extend Object, are these two usages synonymous?
<?>
and <? extends Object>
are synonymous, as you'd expect.
There are a few cases with generics where extends Object
is not actually redundant. For example, <T extends Object & Foo>
will cause T
to become Object
under erasure, whereas with <T extends Foo>
it will become Foo
under erasure. (This can matter if you're trying to retain compatibility with a pre-generics API that used Object
.)
Source: http://download.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/extra/generics/convert.html; it explains why the JDK's java.util.Collections
class has a method with this signature:
public static <T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>> T max(
Collection<? extends T> coll
)