I am trying to secure my application which is built using JSF2.0.
I am confused about when do people choose to go with security alternatives like Shiro, Spring Security or owasp's esapi leaving behind container managed security. Having seen some of related questions on Stack Overflow, where I realized that container based security was more preferred by JSF developers in past. But I have also been strongly recommended to use Apache Shiro. I am novice in terms of the security issues and have no idea what may be the relevant issues & how to deal with them. Therefore I'm looking for something that handles most of the security issues through its default settings/ on its own.
In terms of my application requirements, I have a social application where users with different roles have access to different set of pages and can use different levels of functionality on those pages based on their roles.
In that case what do you think could be a good option for me to go with ?
I personally have been convinced to opt Shiro since it is easy to use and takes care of most of the things for the novice.
What I like about Shiro is that it's really ease to setup permission based security. JAAS is heavily role based which is a granularity that ironically is more useful to consumer webapps than to enterprise apps (as we can notice from your requirements).
It's common for an application server to provide some services on top of JAAS, like single sign on, built in loginmodules, etc, so sometimes when permission granularity isn't a requirement, you should go for JAAS.
Last time I checked Shiro also didn't supported mutual ssl authentication (using digital certificates), but you probably wouldn't be using that...
If you use Shiro your app will probably be more portable between application servers / servlet containers (oh, the irony!), as JavaEE security configuration tends to be vendor specific for most non-trivial setups.
All in all, based on the requirements you specified:
Hope it helps :)