Is Spring Retry guaranteed to work with Spring's @Transactional
annotation?
Specifically, I'm trying to use @Retryable
for optimistic locking. It seems like it would be dependent on the ordering of the AOP proxies that were created. For example, if the calls look like this:
Calling code -> Retry Proxy -> Transaction Proxy -> Actual DB Code
Then it would work correctly, but if the proxies were structured like this:
Calling code -> Transaction Proxy -> Retry Proxy -> Actual DB Code
Then the retry wouldn't work, because the act of closing the transaction is what throws the optmistic locking exception.
In testing, it appeared to generate the first case (retry, then transaction), but I couldn't tell if this was a guaranteed behavior or just lucky.
Found the answer here:
https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/5.0.6.BUILD-SNAPSHOT/spring-framework-reference/data-access.html#transaction-declarative-annotations
Table 2 indicates that the advice for the Transactional
annotation has an order of Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE
, which means that it is safe to combine Retryable
with Transactional
as long as you aren't overriding the order of the advice for either of those annotations. In other words, you can safely use this form:
@Retryable(StaleStateException.class)
@Transactional
public void performDatabaseActions() {
//Database updates here that may cause an optimistic locking failure
//when the transaction closes
}