Java Threads vs OS Threads
Looks like I have messed up with Java Threads/OS Threads and Interpreted language.
Before I begin, I do understand that Green Threads are Java Threads where the threading is taken care of by the JVM and the entire Java process runs only as a single OS Thread. Thereby on a multi processor system it is useless.
Now my questions is. I have two Threads A and B. Each with 100 thousand lines of independent code. I run these threads in my Java Program on a multiprocessor system. Each Thread will be given a native OS Thread to RUN which can run on a different CPU but since Java is interpreted these threads will require to interact with the JVM again and again to convert the byte code to machine instructions ? Am I right ? If yes, than for smaller programs Java Threads wont be a big advantage ?
Once the Hotspot compiles both these execution paths both can be as good as native Threads ? Am I right ?
[EDIT] : An alternate question can be, assume you have a single Java Thread whose code is not JIT compiled, you create that Thread and start() it ? How does the OS Thread and JVM interact to run that Bytecode ?
thanks
Answer
Each Thread will be given a native OS Thread to RUN which can run on a different CPU but since Java is interpreted these threads will require to interact with the JVM again and again to convert the byte code to machine instructions ? Am I right ?
You are mixing two different things; JIT done by the VM and the threading support offered by the VM. Deep down inside, everything you do translates to some sort of native code. A byte-code instruction which uses thread is no different than a JIT'ed code which accesses threads.
If yes, than for smaller programs Java Threads wont be a big advantage ?
Define small here. For short lived processes, yes, threading doesn't make that big a difference since your sequential execution is fast enough. Note that this again depends on the problem being solved. For UI toolkits, no matter how small the application, some sort of threading/asynchronous execution is required to keep the UI responsive.
Threading also makes sense when you have things which can be run in parallel. A typical example would be doing heavy IO in on thread and computation in another. You really wouldn't want to block your processing just because your main thread is blocked doing IO.
Once the Hotspot compiles both these execution paths both can be as good as native Threads ? Am I right ?
See my first point.
Threading really isn't a silver bullet, esp when it comes to the common misconception of "use threads to make this code go faster". A bit of reading and experience will be your best bet. Can I recommend getting a copy of this awesome book? :-)
@Sanjay: Infact now I can reframe my question. If I have a Thread whose code has not been JIT'd how does the OS Thread execute it ?
Again I'll say it, threading is a completely different concept from JIT. Let's try to look at the execution of a program in simple terms:
java pkg.MyClass -> VM locates method to be run -> Start executing the byte-code for method line by line -> convert each byte-code instruction to its native counterpart -> instruction executed by OS -> instruction executed by machine
When JIT has kicked in:
java pkg.MyClass -> VM locates method to be run which has been JIT'ed -> locate the associated native code for that method -> instruction executed by OS -> instruction executed by machine
As you can see, irrespective of the route you follow, the VM instruction has to be mapped to its native counterpart at some point in time. Whether that native code is stored for further re-use or thrown away if a different thing (optimization, remember?).
Hence to answer your question, whenever you write threading code, it is translated to native code and run by the OS. Whether that translation is done on the fly or looked up at that point in time is a completely different issue.