Error while loading coverage session (code 5001)

java eclemma
user5459039 picture user5459039 · May 22, 2017 · Viewed 11.5k times · Source

I got the following error when I am trying to check coverage using EclEmma, please help me out:

Error while loading coverage session (code 5001). Error while analyzing package fragment root java at F/solo-repository/target/test-classes (code 5007). File not found: D:\RDM Services\solo-repository\target\test-classes\com\charter\solo\account\repository\AccountBillInformationRepositoryTest.class. D:\RDM Services\solo-repository\target\test-classes\com\charter\solo\account\repository\AccountBillInformationRepositoryTest.class (The system cannot find the path specified)

Answer

RCB picture RCB · Dec 7, 2017

I had the same error. The suggestions in this answer did not fix it for me. The thing that finally did fix it was:

  • Right click a source folder and select Build Path > Configure Output Folder...
  • Select "Project's default output folder" (even if it happens to be the same path entered in "Specific output folder")
  • Click OK
  • Refresh the project

It seems a bit nonsensical, but did the trick for me.

Related questions

Eclemma says 1 of 4 branches not covered, but which branch is it?

Is there a simple way to tell which branch I am missing? I.e. I have some code like this: if (x || y) { // do stuff } In the coverage highlighting there is a yellow dot in Eclipse that says: 1 of 4 branches …

Read More
Improve Lombok @Data Code Coverage

I am writing unit tests for my project and am trying to achieve at least 80% code coverage. Problem is that I am using lombok's @Data annotation for generating getters and setters and when I run my unit tests, all those …

Read More
How to exclude classes from the coverage calculation in EclEmma without actually excluding them from the coverage itself

I am using EclEmma to test the coverage of my scenario tests and use case tests on my project. I have a Base package which contains the most general classes and the use case tests. The coverage looks like this: …

Read More