Does use of final keyword in Java improve the performance?

java performance final
Abhishek Jain picture Abhishek Jain · Nov 25, 2010 · Viewed 93.8k times · Source

In Java we see lots of places where the final keyword can be used but its use is uncommon.

For example:

String str = "abc";
System.out.println(str);

In the above case, str can be final but this is commonly left off.

When a method is never going to be overridden we can use final keyword. Similarly in case of a class which is not going to be inherited.

Does the use of final keyword in any or all of these cases really improve performance? If so, then how? Please explain. If the proper use of final really matters for performance, what habits should a Java programmer develop to make best use of the keyword?

Answer

Jon Skeet picture Jon Skeet · Nov 25, 2010

Usually not. For virtual methods, HotSpot keeps track of whether the method has actually been overridden, and is able to perform optimizations such as inlining on the assumption that a method hasn't been overridden - until it loads a class which overrides the method, at which point it can undo (or partially undo) those optimizations.

(Of course, this is assuming you're using HotSpot - but it's by far the most common JVM, so...)

To my mind you should use final based on clear design and readability rather than for performance reasons. If you want to change anything for performance reasons, you should perform appropriate measurements before bending the clearest code out of shape - that way you can decide whether any extra performance achieved is worth the poorer readability/design. (In my experience it's almost never worth it; YMMV.)

EDIT: As final fields have been mentioned, it's worth bringing up that they are often a good idea anyway, in terms of clear design. They also change the guaranteed behaviour in terms of cross-thread visibility: after a constructor has completed, any final fields are guaranteed to be visible in other threads immediately. This is probably the most common use of final in my experience, although as a supporter of Josh Bloch's "design for inheritance or prohibit it" rule of thumb, I should probably use final more often for classes...

Related questions

Compile-time constants and variables

The Java language documentation says: If a primitive type or a string is defined as a constant and the value is known at compile time, the compiler replaces the constant name everywhere in the code with its value. This is …

Read More
Is there any performance reason to declare method parameters final in Java?

Is there any performance reason to declare method parameters final in Java? As in: public void foo(int bar) { ... } Versus: public void foo(final int bar) { ... } Assuming that bar is only read and never modified in foo().

Read More
Why defining class as final improves JVM performance?

Quoting from http://sites.google.com/site/gson/gson-design-document: Why are most classes in Gson marked as final? While Gson provides a fairly extensible architecture by providing pluggable serializers and deserializers, Gson classes were not specifically designed to be extensible. …

Read More