I've found a useful article that explains how to make Jersey to use SLF4J instead of JUL. Now my unit test looks like (and it works perfectly):
public class FooTest extends JerseyTest {
@BeforeClass
public static void initLogger() {
java.util.logging.Logger rootLogger =
java.util.logging.LogManager.getLogManager().getLogger("");
java.util.logging.Handler[] handlers = rootLogger.getHandlers();
for (int i = 0; i < handlers.length; i++) {
rootLogger.removeHandler(handlers[i]);
}
org.slf4j.bridge.SLF4JBridgeHandler.install();
}
public FooTest() {
super("com.XXX");
}
@Test
public void testSomething() throws Exception {
// ...
}
}
My pom.xml
includes these dependencies:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId>
<version>1.6.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-log4j12</artifactId>
<version>1.6.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>jul-to-slf4j</artifactId>
<version>1.6.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>log4j</groupId>
<artifactId>log4j</artifactId>
<version>1.2.16</version>
</dependency>
It works perfectly, but I don't want to make the same configuration in every unit test. It's an obvious code duplication, which I would like to avoid. How can I do this more effectively?
ps. Maybe it's not possible to optimize the code above and I'm doing the best I can?
If you are using the client API you can manually redirect the logs to slf4j (note that it may break in future versions although it seems unlikely):
Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MyClass.class); //slf4j logger
WebTarget ws = ClientBuilder.newClient(config)
.register(new LoggingFilter(new JulFacade(), true));
private static class JulFacade extends java.util.logging.Logger {
JulFacade() { super("Jersey", null); }
@Override public void info(String msg) { LOG.info(msg); }
}