Booleans, conditional operators and autoboxing

BalusC picture BalusC · Oct 7, 2010 · Viewed 19.7k times · Source

Why does this throw NullPointerException

public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
    Boolean b = true ? returnsNull() : false; // NPE on this line.
    System.out.println(b);
}

public static Boolean returnsNull() {
    return null;
}

while this doesn't

public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
    Boolean b = true ? null : false;
    System.out.println(b); // null
}

?

The solution is by the way to replace false by Boolean.FALSE to avoid null being unboxed to boolean --which isn't possible. But that isn't the question. The question is why? Are there any references in JLS which confirms this behaviour, especially of the 2nd case?

Answer

Bert F picture Bert F · Oct 7, 2010

The difference is that the explicit type of the returnsNull() method affects the static typing of the expressions at compile time:

E1: `true ? returnsNull() : false` - boolean (auto-unboxing 2nd operand to boolean)

E2: `true ? null : false` - Boolean (autoboxing of 3rd operand to Boolean)

See Java Language Specification, section 15.25 Conditional Operator ? :

  • For E1, the types of the 2nd and 3rd operands are Boolean and boolean respectively, so this clause applies:

    If one of the second and third operands is of type boolean and the type of the other is of type Boolean, then the type of the conditional expression is boolean.

    Since the type of the expression is boolean, the 2nd operand must be coerced to boolean. The compiler inserts auto-unboxing code to the 2nd operand (return value of returnsNull()) to make it type boolean. This of course causes the NPE from the null returned at run-time.

  • For E2, types of the 2nd and 3rd operands are <special null type> (not Boolean as in E1!) and boolean respectively, so no specific typing clause applies (go read 'em!), so the final "otherwise" clause applies:

    Otherwise, the second and third operands are of types S1 and S2 respectively. Let T1 be the type that results from applying boxing conversion to S1, and let T2 be the type that results from applying boxing conversion to S2. The type of the conditional expression is the result of applying capture conversion (§5.1.10) to lub(T1, T2) (§15.12.2.7).

    • S1 == <special null type> (see §4.1)
    • S2 == boolean
    • T1 == box(S1) == <special null type> (see last item in list of boxing conversions in §5.1.7)
    • T2 == box(S2) == `Boolean
    • lub(T1, T2) == Boolean

    So the type of the conditional expression is Boolean and the 3rd operand must be coerced to Boolean. The compiler inserts auto-boxing code for the 3rd operand (false). The 2nd operand doesn't need the auto-unboxing as in E1, so no auto-unboxing NPE when null is returned.


This question needs a similar type analysis:

Java conditional operator ?: result type