What are the main differences between StringTemplate and FreeMarker?
The net seems to be full of comparisons between Velocity and FreeMarker, and they seem to be reasonably equivalent. But there seems to be almost no comparisons between StringTemplate and FreeMarker!
So, what are the main differences between StringTemplate and FreeMarker?
My usage for them would be to generate HTML pages only. Out of the two, I would've expected FreeMarker to be the more suitable and more capable, as that seems to the more common one - but through a quick glance it seems that StringTemplate actually has more suitable features!
It would be great if someone who has used both would have time to comment - for the actual specifics, I can just read the documentation side by side, but I'd like something to get started with.
Answer
I designed ST to build jGuru after getting sick of the "code in template" model of JSP. Velocity and friends (i.e., every other engine i think) give you more power than you need. I used basically four features to build jGuru.com (as described in paper). More features are unnecessary and lead you to entangle your model into the template. If you're building a one-off prototype, that's ok and any engine is fine. Code in templates is ok in that case since you don't care about maintenance.
Another thing people seem to ignore: how the hell can a graphics designer read code in templates? They can't. So, how can they work on the templates then? Even changing the order of some elements can break your model. You really need the separation to work in commercial environment, unless you want a site that looks like a coder built the html ;)