getServletConfigClasses() vs getRootConfigClasses() when extending AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer

Question

What is the difference between getServletConfigClasses() vs getRootConfigClasses() when extending AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer. I've been reading a lot sources since this morning but I haven't get any clear understanding on the differences yet :

Please have look at these two configurations :

1).

public class SpringMvcInitializer extends AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer {

    @Override
    protected Class<?>[] getRootConfigClasses() {         
        return new Class[] { ConServlet.class }; 
    }
    @Override
    protected Class<?>[] getServletConfigClasses() {                      
        return null;
    }
        ....
        ....    
        }

The ConServlet.class is refering to

@EnableWebMvc 
@Configuration
@ComponentScan({ "com" })
@Import({ SecurityConfig.class })
public class ConServlet {
    @Bean
    public InternalResourceViewResolver viewResolver() {
        InternalResourceViewResolver viewResolver = new InternalResourceViewResolver();
        viewResolver.setViewClass(JstlView.class);
        viewResolver.setPrefix("/WEB-INF/pages/");
        viewResolver.setSuffix(".jsp");
        return viewResolver;
    }   
}

2).

public class WebInitializer extends AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer {

    @Override
    protected Class<?>[] getRootConfigClasses() {
        return null;
    }

    @Override
    protected Class<?>[] getServletConfigClasses() {
        return new Class<?>[] { WebConfig.class }; 
    }
    .....
}

the WebConfig.class is refering to

@Configuration
@EnableWebMvc
@ComponentScan(basePackages = { "....." })
public class WebConfig extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {

    @Override
    public void addResourceHandlers(ResourceHandlerRegistry registry) {
        registry.addResourceHandler("/resources/**").addResourceLocations("/resources/");
    }

    @Bean
    public ViewResolver viewResolver() {

        InternalResourceViewResolver viewResolver = new InternalResourceViewResolver();
        viewResolver.setViewClass(JstlView.class);
        viewResolver.setPrefix("/WEB-INF/views");
        viewResolver.setSuffix(".jsp");
        return viewResolver;
    }
}

I see both ConServlet & WebConfig (more or less) doing the same things like initializating view :

But why :

• ConServlet is returned in getRootConfigClasses()
• while WebConfig is returned in getServletConfigClasses()

I read the documentation

both getRootConfigClasses() & getServletConfigClasses() is for

Specify @Configuration and/or @Component classes to be provided to.. (their differences )

• the root application context for getRootConfigClasses()
• the dispatcher servlet application context for getServletConfigClasses()

but why then ConServlet & WebConfig doing same things (like initizialising view), maybe I'm the one misunderstood it. What's are actually root context and dispatcher servlets (I know this one) in the simple term/example

Thank you!

Answer 1

A Bit on ApplicationContext Hierarchies

---

Spring's ApplicationContext provides the capability of loading multiple (hierarchical) contexts, allowing each to be focused on one particular layer, such as the web layer of an application or middle-tier services.

One of the canonical examples of using hierarchical ApplicationContext is when we have multiple DispatcherServlets in a web application and we're going to share some of the common beans such as datasources between them. This way, we can define a root ApplicationContext that contain all the common beans and multiple WebApplicationContexts that inherit the common beans from the root context.

In the Web MVC framework, each DispatcherServlet has its own WebApplicationContext, which inherits all the beans already defined in the root WebApplicationContext. These inherited beans can be overridden in the servlet-specific scope, and you can define new scope-specific beans local to a given Servlet instance.

^{Typical context hierarchy in Spring Web MVC (Spring Documentation)}

If you're living in a single DispatherServlet world, it is also possible to have just one root context for this scenario:

^{Single root context in Spring Web MVC (Spring Documentation)}

Talk is cheap, Show me the code!

---

Suppose we're developing a web application and we're going to use Spring MVC, Spring Security and Spring Data JPA. For this simple scenario, we would have at least three different config files. A WebConfig that contains all our web related configurations, such as ViewResolvers, Controllers, ArgumentResolvers, etc. Something like following:

@EnableWebMvc
@Configuration
@ComponentScan(basePackages = "com.so.web")
public class WebConfig extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
    @Bean
    public InternalResourceViewResolver viewResolver() {
        InternalResourceViewResolver viewResolver = new InternalResourceViewResolver();
        viewResolver.setPrefix("/WEB-INF/views/");
        viewResolver.setSuffix(".jsp");

        return viewResolver;
    }

    @Override
    public void configurePathMatch(PathMatchConfigurer configurer) {
        final boolean DO_NOT_USE_SUFFIX_PATTERN_MATCHING = false;
        configurer.setUseSuffixPatternMatch(DO_NOT_USE_SUFFIX_PATTERN_MATCHING);
    }
}

Here I'm defining a ViewResolver to resolve my plain old jsps, poor life decisions, basically. We would need a RepositoryConfig, which contains all the data access facilities such as DataSource, EntityManagerFactory, TransactionManager, etc. It probably would be like following:

@Configuration
@EnableTransactionManagement
@EnableJpaRepositories(basePackages = "com.so.repository")
public class RepositoryConfig {
    @Bean
    public DataSource dataSource() { ... }

    @Bean
    public LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean entityManagerFactory() { ... }
    
    @Bean
    public PlatformTransactionManager transactionManager() { ... }
}

And a SecurityConfig which contains all the security related stuff!

@Configuration
@EnableWebSecurity
public class SecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
    @Override
    @Autowired
    protected void configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth) throws Exception { ... }

    @Override
    protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception { ... }
}

For gluing all these together, we have two options. First, we can define a typical hierarchical ApplicationContext, by adding RepositoryConfig and SecurityConfig in root context and WebConfig in their child context:

public class ServletInitializer extends AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer {
    @Override
    protected Class<?>[] getRootConfigClasses() {
        return new Class<?>[] { RepositoryConfig.class, SecurityConfig.class };
    }

    @Override
    protected Class<?>[] getServletConfigClasses() {
        return new Class<?>[] { WebConfig.class };
    }

    @Override
    protected String[] getServletMappings() {
        return new String[] { "/" };
    }
}

Since we have a single DispatcherServlet here, we can add the WebConfig to the root context and make the servlet context empty:

public class ServletInitializer extends AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer {
    @Override
    protected Class<?>[] getRootConfigClasses() {
        return new Class<?>[] { RepositoryConfig.class, SecurityConfig.class, WebConfig.class };
    }

    @Override
    protected Class<?>[] getServletConfigClasses() {
        return null;
    }

    @Override
    protected String[] getServletMappings() {
        return new String[] { "/" };
    }
}

Further Reading

---

Skaffman did a great job on explaining ApplicationContext hierarchies in this answer, which is highly recommended. Also, you can read Spring Documentation.