The method is ambiguous for the type Error

theimpatientcoder picture theimpatientcoder · Jan 1, 2016 · Viewed 10.5k times · Source

I am trying to understand how Overloading in JAVA works and trying to get grasp of various overloading rules that are applied in case of widening, autoboxing and varargs in JAVA. I am not able to understand what is happening in the following scenario:

 package package1;

 public class JustAClass {
     public static void add(int a, long b) {
         System.out.println("all primitives");
     }

   //public static void add(Integer a, long b) {
   //     System.out.println("Wraper int, primitive long");
   //}

     public static void add(int a, Long b) {
         System.out.println("Primitive int, Wrapper long");
     }

     public static void add(Integer a, Long b){
         System.out.println("All wrapper");
     }

     public static void main(String[] args) {
        int a = 10;
        Integer b = 10;
        long c = 9;
        Long d = 9l;

        add(a,c);
        add(a,d);
        add(b,c);
        add(b,d);
 }

}

At this point, I get a compilation error at the third invocation of the add method saying The method is ambiguous for the type Error . Why is this so? What are the rules for determining which invocation of method will work? What is exactly happening in the following case? I feel that fourth overloaded add method should work. Please help me understand the concept behind this.

Answer

Eran picture Eran · Jan 1, 2016

There are 3 stages to method overloading resolution. The first stage doesn't do auto-boxing/unboxing, which means methods that require boxing/unboxing of the passed parameters in order to match one of the overloaded versions of add will only be considered if no match was found that doesn't require boxing/unboxing. That's why 3 of your calls, which have a single exact match, work. Regarding add(b,c);, see below why it's ambiguous.

   add(a,c); // exact match to add(int a, long b)
   add(a,d); // exact match to add(int a, Long b)
   add(b,c); // there is no exact match, so at least one of the passed parameters must
             // be boxed or unboxed. However, by unboxing b to int or boxing 
             // c to Long, each of the three add methods can match, and the 
             // compiler doesn't know which one to prefer
   add(b,d); // exact match to add(Integer a, Long b)