How come generic type parameter says "extends" Comparable not "implements"?

Meow picture Meow · Jul 24, 2010 · Viewed 16.9k times · Source

I tried to write generic function that remove the duplicate elements from array.

public static <E extends Comparable<E>> ArrayList<E> removeDuplicate(E[] arr) {
    //do quicksort
    Arrays.sort(arr);
    ArrayList<E> list = new ArrayList<E>();
    int i;
    for(i=0; i<arr.length-1; i++) {
        if(arr[i].compareTo(arr[i+1]) != 0) { //if not duplicate, add to the list
            list.add(arr[i]);
        }
    }
    list.add(arr[i]); //add last element
    return list;
}

As you can see you can't pass primitive type like int[] array since I am comparing elements by compareTo() method that defined in Comparable interface.

I noticed the first line (method declaration):

public static <E extends Comparable<E>> ArrayList<E> removeDuplicate(E[] arr) {

How come it says "extends Comparable" ?

Comparable is an interface so why is it not "implement Comparable"? This is first time I wrote generic function so I'm bit confused about such detail. (any wondering would prevent me from understanding..)

EDIT: Found this article related to this topic.

http://www.tutorialspoint.com/java/java_generics.htm

Answer

Andrei Fierbinteanu picture Andrei Fierbinteanu · Jul 24, 2010

This is just the convention chosen for generics. When using bounded type parameters you use extends (even though it might mean implements in some cases) or super.

You can even do something like <E extends Comparable<E> & Cloneable> to define that the object that would replace the type parameter should implement both those interfaces.