In a legacy database, I have three tables: Users, Workgroups, and UsersWorkgroup. UsersWorkgroup stores what role a user has in a workgroup. Here are the relevant code snippets:
@Entity
@Table(name = "users_workgroup")
public class UsersWorkgroup implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@EmbeddedId
protected UsersWorkgroupPK usersWorkgroupPK;
@JoinColumn(name = "idworkgroup", referencedColumnName = "idworkgroup")
@ManyToOne(optional = false)
private Workgroup workgroup;
@JoinColumn(name = "user_name", referencedColumnName = "user_name")
@ManyToOne(optional = false)
private Users users;
@Column(name = "role")
private Integer role;
@Embeddable
public class UsersWorkgroupPK implements Serializable {
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name = "idworkgroup", insertable=false, updatable=false)
private int idworkgroup;
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name = "user_name", insertable=false, updatable=false)
private String userName;
@Entity
@Table(name = "workgroup")
public class Workgroup implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name = "idworkgroup")
private Integer idworkgroup;
@Column(name = "name")
private String name;
@OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = "idworkgroup")
private Collection<UsersWorkgroup> usersWorkgroupCollection;
And of course, problem is, it doesn't work. Currently I get this exception:
Exception Description: An incompatible mapping has been encountered between [class entity.Workgroup] and [class entity.UsersWorkgroup]. This usually occurs when the cardinality of a mapping does not correspond with the cardinality of its backpointer.
Which I don't understand since OneToMany should match ManyToOne... Or is it a ManyToMany relationship? If I switch to @ManyToMany, I get this:
Exception Description: The target entity of the relationship attribute [workgroup] on the class [class com.ericsson.rsg.ejb.entity.UsersWorkgroup] cannot be determined. When not using generics, ensure the target entity is defined on the relationship mapping.
I'm trying to understand compound keys (embedded), but all the examples I could find have only simple columns that are not foreign keys (but that's the whole point of a compound key, isn't it?). Can the UsersWorkgroup table secretly be a join table?
Should I declare the PK class as a strict POJO class? Or should I put the @JoinColumn annotations in the PK class? How do I refer to the columns within the compound key from another table? Should I initialize the PK object in the refering class constructor, or is it not necessary?
I feel stuck completely.
First of all, I think your relation is a Many To Many, as a user can be in many groups, and a group can have many users (or I would assume so).
Second, as far as I know you have to reference both id_workgroup and user_name as JoinColumns, because they are part of the PK and a unit, so both should be referenced.
Also, I see the "equals" and "hashCode" methods missing from your embedded PK, as well as the getters/setters. I believe they are mandatory.