java.lang.Error: "Not enough storage is available to process this command" when generating images

jhericks picture jhericks · Apr 14, 2010 · Viewed 13.2k times · Source

I am running a web application on BEA Weblogic 9.2. Until recently, we were using JDK 1.5.0_04, with JAI 1.1.2_01 and Image IO 1.1. In some circumstances (we never figured out exactly why), when we were processing large images (but not that large - a few MB), the JVM would crash without any error message or stack trace or anything. This didn't happen much in production, but enough to be a nuisance and eventually we were able to reproduce it.

We decided to switch to JRockit90 1.5.0_04 and we were no longer able to reproduce the problem in our test environment, so we thought we had it licked. Now, however, after the application server has been up for a while, we start getting the error message, "Not enough storage is available to process this command" during image operations. For example:

java.lang.Error: Error starting thread: Not enough storage is available to process this command.
at java.lang.Thread.start()V(Unknown Source)
at sun.awt.image.ImageFetcher$1.run(ImageFetcher.java:279)
at sun.awt.image.ImageFetcher.createFetchers(ImageFetcher.java:272)
at sun.awt.image.ImageFetcher.add(ImageFetcher.java:55)
at sun.awt.image.InputStreamImageSource.startProduction(InputStreamImageSource.java:149)
at sun.awt.image.InputStreamImageSource.addConsumer(InputStreamImageSource.java:106)
at sun.awt.image.InputStreamImageSource.startProduction(InputStreamImageSource.java:144)
at sun.awt.image.ImageRepresentation.startProduction(ImageRepresentation.java:647)
at sun.awt.image.ImageRepresentation.prepare(ImageRepresentation.java:684)
at sun.awt.SunToolkit.prepareImage(SunToolkit.java:734)
at java.awt.Component.prepareImage(Component.java:3073)
at java.awt.ImageMediaEntry.startLoad(MediaTracker.java:906)
at java.awt.MediaEntry.getStatus(MediaTracker.java:851)
at java.awt.ImageMediaEntry.getStatus(MediaTracker.java:902)
at java.awt.MediaTracker.statusAll(MediaTracker.java:454)
at java.awt.MediaTracker.waitForAll(MediaTracker.java:405)
at java.awt.MediaTracker.waitForAll(MediaTracker.java:375)
at SfxNET.System.Drawing.ImageLoader.loadImage(Ljava.awt.Image;)Ljava.awt.image.BufferedImage;(Unknown Source)
at SfxNET.System.Drawing.ImageLoader.loadImage(Ljava.net.URL;)Ljava.awt.image.BufferedImage;(Unknown Source)
at Resources.Tools.Commands.W$zw(Ljava.lang.ClassLoader;)V(Unknown Source)
at Resources.Tools.Commands.getContents()[[Ljava.lang.Object;(Unknown Source)
at SfxNET.sfxUtils.SfxResourceBundle.handleGetObject(Ljava.lang.String;)Ljava.lang.Object;(Unknown Source)
at java.util.ResourceBundle.getObject(ResourceBundle.java:320)
at SoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.wxvw.yxWW(Ljava.lang.String;Z)Ljava.lang.Object;(Unknown Source)
at SoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.wxvw.vxWW(Ljava.lang.String;)Ljava.lang.Object;(Unknown Source)
at SoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.CommandBar.YWww(LSoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.wxvw;IIII)V(Unknown Source)
at SoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.Internet.Server.xxvw.YzzW(LSoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.Internet.Server.ChartCore;Z)LSoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.CommandBar;(Unknown Source)
at SoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.Internet.Server.xxvw.XzzW(LSoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.Internet.Server.ChartCore;)V(Unknown Source)
at SoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.Internet.Server.ChartCore.OnDeserialization(Ljava.lang.Object;)V(Unknown Source)
at SoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.Internet.Server.ChartCore.Zvvz(LSoftwareFX.internal.ChartFX.Base.wzzy;)V(Unknown Source)

Has anyone seen something like this before? Any clue what might be happening?

Answer

jhericks picture jhericks · Jun 7, 2010

Marcus Adams should get the credit for this, but his little advice was in the form of a comment not an answer, so I can't just check it. He pointed me to this example from another answer and that did the trick.

Looking at the registry setting for \System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\SubSystem and found this: SharedSection=1024,3072,512. Since this was a service (headless) we changed the third number. The new value was SharedSection=1024,3072,1024. The problem has not recurred since making this change a few weeks ago.