Why private method can not be final as well?

java oop methods final
MightyPork picture MightyPork · Apr 18, 2014 · Viewed 11.1k times · Source

Is it redundant to add private and final to a same method?

class SomeClass {

    //--snip--

    private final void doStuff()
    {
        // private work here
    }
}

If it's private, there's no way anyone can override it, right?

Why is it possible to add final keyword if it has no effect? (or am I missing something?)

Answer

yshavit picture yshavit · Apr 18, 2014

Basically, it's allowed because they didn't feel like it's worthwhile to put a special case prohibiting the private modifier. It's like how you can also declare methods on an interface as public, or nested classes in an interface as static, even though those keywords are implied in interfaces. You can also declare final methods on a final class, etc.

Java took the stance of not complaining when you add redundant modifiers. They do it consistently.

Related questions

Can I use methods of a class without instantiating this class?

I have a class with several methods and there is no constructor among these methods. So, I am wondering if it is possible to call a method of a class without a creation of an instance of the class. For …

Read More
What does the 'static' keyword do in a class?

To be specific, I was trying this code: package hello; public class Hello { Clock clock = new Clock(); public static void main(String args[]) { clock.sayTime(); } } But it gave the error Cannot access non-static field in static method main So I …

Read More
Examples of GoF Design Patterns in Java's core libraries

I am learning GoF Java Design Patterns and I want to see some real life examples of them. What are some good examples of these Design Patterns in Java's core libraries?

Read More