Java's Fork/Join vs ExecutorService - when to use which?

java multithreading concurrency executorservice fork-join
Parobay picture Parobay · Jan 16, 2014 · Viewed 34k times · Source

I just finished reading this post: What's the advantage of a Java-5 ThreadPoolExecutor over a Java-7 ForkJoinPool? and felt that the answer is not straight enough.

Can you explain in simple language and examples, what are the trade-offs between Java 7's Fork-Join framework and the older solutions?

I also read the Google's #1 hit on the topic Java Tip: When to use ForkJoinPool vs ExecutorService from javaworld.com but the article doesn't answer the title question when, it talks about api differences mostly ...

Answer

Jakub Kubrynski picture Jakub Kubrynski · Jan 16, 2014

Fork-join allows you to easily execute divide and conquer jobs, which have to be implemented manually if you want to execute it in ExecutorService. In practice ExecutorService is usually used to process many independent requests (aka transaction) concurrently, and fork-join when you want to accelerate one coherent job.

Related questions

How to wait for all threads to finish, using ExecutorService?

I need to execute some amount of tasks 4 at a time, something like this: ExecutorService taskExecutor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4); while(...) { taskExecutor.execute(new MyTask()); } //...wait for completion somehow How can I get notified once all of them are complete? For now …

Read More
Executors.newCachedThreadPool() versus Executors.newFixedThreadPool()

newCachedThreadPool() versus newFixedThreadPool() When should I use one or the other? Which strategy is better in terms of resource utilization?

Read More
ExecutorService that interrupts tasks after a timeout

I'm looking for an ExecutorService implementation that can be provided with a timeout. Tasks that are submitted to the ExecutorService are interrupted if they take longer than the timeout to run. Implementing such a beast isn't such a difficult task, …

Read More