Multiple annotations of the same type on one element?

Max A. picture Max A. · Oct 12, 2009 · Viewed 75.6k times · Source

I'm attempting to slap two or more annotations of the same type on a single element, in this case, a method. Here's the approximate code that I'm working with:

public class Dupe {
    public @interface Foo {
      String bar();
    }

    @Foo(bar="one")
    @Foo(bar="two")
    public void haha() {}
}

When compiling the above, javac complains about a duplicate annotation:

max@upsight:~/work/daybreak$ javac Dupe.java 
Dupe.java:5: duplicate annotation

Is it simply not possible to repeat annotations like this? Pedantically speaking, aren't the two instances of @Foo above different due to their contents being different?

If the above isn't possible, what are some potential workarounds?

UPDATE: I've been asked to describe my use case. Here goes.

I'm building a syntax sugarish mechanism to "map" POJOs to document stores such as MongoDB. I want to allow indexes to be specified as annotations on the getters or setters. Here's a contrived example:

public class Employee {
    private List<Project> projects;

    @Index(expr = "project.client_id")
    @Index(expr = "project.start_date")
    public List<Project> getProjects() { return projects; }
}

Obviously, I want to be able to quickly find instances of Employee by various properties of Project. I can either specify @Index twice with different expr() values, or take the approach specified in the accepted answer. Even though Hibernate does this and it's not considered a hack, I think it still makes sense to at least allow having multiple annotations of the same type on a single element.

Answer

sfussenegger picture sfussenegger · Oct 12, 2009

Two or more annotations of same type aren't allowed. However, you could do something like this:

public @interface Foos {
    Foo[] value();
}

@Foos({@Foo(bar="one"), @Foo(bar="two")})
public void haha() {}

You'll need dedicated handling of Foos annotation in code though.

btw, I've just used this 2 hours ago to work around the same problem :)