If I write
List<Integer> a1 = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3);
List<Integer> a2 = Collections.unmodifiableList(a1);
a2
is read-only but if I write
a1.set(0,10);
then a2
is also modified.
If in the API is said:
Returns an unmodifiable view of the specified collection. This method allows modules to provide users with "read-only" access to internal collections.
then, why if I modify the original collection also the target-copied collection is modified?
Maybe did I misunderstand the meaning and if so what's the way to write a defensive copy of that collection?
Yes, you understood it correctly. The idea is that the object returned by umodifiableCollection
can't directly be changed, but could change through other means (effectively by changing the internal collection directly).
As long as something has access to the internal list, the "unmodifiable" collection could be changed.
That's why you usually construct a unmodifiable collection and make sure that nothing can ever get to the internal list:
Collection<Integer> myUmodifiableCollection = Collection.umodifiableCollection(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3));
Since nothing ever gets a reference to the List
created by asList
, this is a truly unmodifiable collection.
The advantage of this approach is that you don't need to copy the original collection/list at all, which avoids using memory and computing power.
Guava provides the ImmutableCollection
class (and its subclasses such as ImmutableList
) which provide true immutable collections (usually by copying the source).