Instances of this class are part of a large object graph and are not at the root of the object graph:
public class Day
{
public Day(LocalDate date, List<LocalTime> times)
{
this.date = date;
this.times = times;
}
public Day()
{
this(null, null);
}
public LocalDate getDate()
{
return date;
}
public List<LocalTime> getTimes()
{
return times;
}
private final LocalDate date;
private final List<LocalTime> times;
}
The object graph is converted to JSON using Jersey and JAXB. I have XmlAdapter
s registered for LocalDate
and LocalTime
.
The problem is that it's only working for the date
property and not the times
property. I suspect this has something to do with the fact that times
is a list rather than a single value. How, then, do I tell Jersey/JAXB to marshall each element in the times
list using the registered XmlAdapter
?
Update:
I confirmed that LocalTime
marshalling is indeed working for scalar LocalTime
properties by adding a scalar LocalTime
property and observing the expected output in the JSON.
For completeness, here's package-info.java:
@XmlJavaTypeAdapters({
@XmlJavaTypeAdapter(value = LocalDateAdapter.class, type = LocalDate.class),
@XmlJavaTypeAdapter(value = LocalTimeAdapter.class, type = LocalTime.class)
})
package same.package.as.everything.else;
LocalDateAdapter
:
public class LocalDateAdapter extends XmlAdapter<String, LocalDate>
{
@Override
public LocalDate unmarshal(String v) throws Exception
{
return formatter.parseLocalDate(v);
}
@Override
public String marshal(LocalDate v) throws Exception
{
return formatter.print(v);
}
private final DateTimeFormatter formatter = DateTimeFormat.forPattern("yyyyMMdd");
}
LocalTimeAdapter
:
public class LocalTimeAdapter extends XmlAdapter<String, LocalTime>
{
@Override
public LocalTime unmarshal(String v) throws Exception
{
return formatter.parseLocalTime(v);
}
@Override
public String marshal(LocalTime v) throws Exception
{
return formatter.print(v);
}
private final DateTimeFormatter formatter = DateTimeFormat.forPattern("HHmm");
An XmlAdapter
for a class is applied to a mapped field/property of that type, and in the case of collections, for each item in the collection. The example below proves that this works. Have you tried running your example standalone to XML to verify the mappings that way. Is suspect the problem is something else other than the XmlAdapter
specifically.
StringAdapter
The following XmlAdapter
will convert a String
to lower case on the unmarshal operation and convert it to upper case when marshalled.
package forum14569293;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.adapters.XmlAdapter;
public class StringAdapter extends XmlAdapter<String, String> {
@Override
public String unmarshal(String v) throws Exception {
return v.toLowerCase();
}
@Override
public String marshal(String v) throws Exception {
return v.toUpperCase();
}
}
package-info
Just as in your question a package level @XmlJavaTypeAdapters
annotation will be used to register the XmlAdapter
. This will register this XmlAdapter
for all mapped String
properties within this package (see: http://blog.bdoughan.com/2012/02/jaxb-and-package-level-xmladapters.html).
@XmlJavaTypeAdapters({
@XmlJavaTypeAdapter(value=StringAdapter.class, type=String.class)
})
package forum14569293;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.adapters.*;
Root
Below is a sample domain model similar to your Day
class with two mapped properties. The first is of type String
and the second List<String>
. One thing I notice about your Day
class is that you only have get
methods. This means that you will need to add an @XmlElement
annotation for a JAXB impl to consider that a mapped property.
package forum14569293;
import java.util.*;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.*;
@XmlRootElement
public class Root {
public Root(String foo, List<String> bar) {
this.foo = foo;
this.bar = bar;
}
public Root() {
this(null, null);
}
@XmlElement
public String getFoo() {
return foo;
}
@XmlElement
public List<String> getBar() {
return bar;
}
private final String foo;
private final List<String> bar;
}
Demo
package forum14569293;
import java.util.*;
import javax.xml.bind.*;
public class Demo {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
JAXBContext jc = JAXBContext.newInstance(Root.class);
List<String> bar = new ArrayList<String>(3);
bar.add("a");
bar.add("b");
bar.add("c");
Root root = new Root("Hello World", bar);
Marshaller marshaller = jc.createMarshaller();
marshaller.setProperty(Marshaller.JAXB_FORMATTED_OUTPUT, true);
marshaller.marshal(root, System.out);
}
}
Output
Below is the output from running the demo code we see that all the strings were converted to upper case by the XmlAdapter
.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<root>
<bar>A</bar>
<bar>B</bar>
<bar>C</bar>
<foo>HELLO WORLD</foo>
</root>
UPDATE
Thanks. I tried it and the XML consisted of one empty tag only, meaning there's something about the POJO model that JAXB doesn't like. (Perhaps it should be Serializable?)
JAXB does not require that POJOs implement Serializable
.
That's interesting because it seems to indicate that the only part JAXB plays in this is to lend its annotations and some other interfaces (e.g. XmlAdapter) to the JSON (de)serializer and that's where the relationship ends.
It depends on what is being used as the JSON binding layer. The JAXB (JSR-222) specification does not cover JSON-binding so this type of support is beyond the spec. EclipseLink JAXB (MOXy) offers native JSON-binding (I'm the MOXy lead) with it you could do something like:
Marshaller marshaller = jc.createMarshaller();
marshaller.setProperty(Marshaller.JAXB_FORMATTED_OUTPUT, true);
marshaller.setProperty(MarshallerProperties.MEDIA_TYPE, "application/json");
marshaller.setProperty(MarshallerProperties.JSON_INCLUDE_ROOT, false);
marshaller.marshal(root, System.out);
And get the following output that takes the XmlAdapter
into account:
{
"bar" : [ "A", "B", "C" ],
"foo" : "HELLO WORLD"
}
Nevertheless, when I get an opportunity I will do what I can to get JAXB to generate the XML and that may reveal something else.
This would be useful as I do not believe what you are seeing is a JAXB issue, but an issue in the JSON binding layer that you are using.