I'm calling a @JSFunction
annotated method of a ScriptableObject
The JavaScript file
Target = Packages.com.acme.rhino.Target;
function evaluate() {
var t = Target();
t.addModifier("foobar", 1);
return t;
}
The Java File
public class Target extends ScriptableObject {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public List<Modifier> modifiers = new LinkedList<>();
@JSConstructor
public Target() {
}
@JSFunction
public void addModifier(final String message, final int value) {
modifiers.add(new Modifier(message, value));
}
public int getValue() {
int sum = 0;
for (final Modifier modifier : modifiers) {
sum += modifier.getValue();
}
return sum;
}
@Override
public String getClassName() {
return "Target";
}
}
But I get
org.mozilla.javascript.EcmaError: TypeError: Cannot find default value for object.
at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.constructError(ScriptRuntime.java:3687)
at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.constructError(ScriptRuntime.java:3665)
at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.typeError(ScriptRuntime.java:3693)
at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.typeError1(ScriptRuntime.java:3705)
at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptableObject.getDefaultValue(ScriptableObject.java:976 )
at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptableObject.getDefaultValue(ScriptableObject.java:895 )
at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.toString(ScriptRuntime.java:761)
at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.notFunctionError(ScriptRuntime.java:3774)
at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.getPropFunctionAndThisHelper(ScriptRuntime. java:2269)
at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.getPropFunctionAndThis(ScriptRuntime. java:2251)
at org.mozilla.javascript.optimizer.OptRuntime.callProp0(OptRuntime.java:83)
at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.script_5._c_evaluate_1(script:6)
at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.script_5.call(script)
at org.mozilla.javascript.ContextFactory.doTopCall(ContextFactory.java:394)
at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.doTopCall(ScriptRuntime.java:3091)
at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.script_5.call(script)
and don't know where to go from there. When I don't call addModifier
method the given code works, and given the error notFunctionError
down in the stack trace I think that Rhino doesn't interpret the given method as a JavaScript Function.
Complete Maven project that reproduces the error can be found here
tl;dr see these two alternatives.
The problem with the approach above is that Target.prototype
is not properly set up in the script scope. See the static ScriptableObject.defineClass()
method for details on how to properly define prototypes in a script scope.
You have a couple alternatives for providing the Target
constructor to your scripts. The first alternative would be to always define the Target
constructor for all scripts. This works well if you know ahead of time that you want Target
to be globally available. This basically comes down to the following:
final Context context = Context.enter();
try {
final ScriptableObject scope = context.initStandardObjects();
ScriptableObject.defineClass(scope, Target.class, false, true);
context.evaluateString(scope, script, "script", 1, null);
// etc.
} finally {
Context.exit();
}
If instead you want the script author to decide which constructors are necessary, the second alternative is to provide the defineClass
function to scripts. With this function, script authors can "import" any scriptable objects on their class path (which may be more than you want to allow). To provide the defineClass
functions to scripts, do the following after entering the context:
final Context context = Context.enter();
try {
final ScriptableObject scope = context.initStandardObjects();
scope.defineFunctionProperties(
new String[] {"defineClass"},
Global.class,
ScriptableObject.DONTENUM);
context.evaluateString(scope, script, "script", 1, null);
// etc.
} finally {
Context.exit();
}
And then, the JavaScript author makes use of the Target
constructor with the following:
defineClass("com.acme.rhino.Target");
// whatever `getClassName()` returns is now available
var target = new Target();
In both of the above branches, I've made a couple other changes that set you up better if you add more to the Target
constructor. The zero argument constructor doesn't need the @JSConstructor
annotation. If you later want to have a constructor that accepts arguments, this zero argument constructor will be used as the prototype constructor, and you can use the @JSConstructor
annotation on a method that will be used to initialize your object. Depending on how you author this constructor method, it will become important to use the new
keyword in your JavaScript.
In short, the Packages.com.acme...
syntax is not useful for getting access to ScriptableObject
constructors from scripts.