Injecting EntityManager Vs. EntityManagerFactory
A long question, please bear with me.
We are using Spring+JPA for a web application. My team is debating over injecting EntityManagerFactory in the GenericDAO (a DAO based on Generics something on the lines provided by APPFUSE, we do not use JpaDaosupport for some reason) over injecting an EntityManager. We are using "application managed persistence".
The arguments against injecting a EntityManagerFactory is that its too heavy and so is not required, the EntityManager does what we need. Also, as Spring would create a new instance of a DAO for every web request(I doubt this) there are not going to be any concurrency issues as in the same EntityManager instance is shared by two threads.
The argument for injecting EFM is that its a good practice over all its always good to have a handle to a factory.
I am not sure which is the best approach, can someone please enlighten me?
Answer
The pros and cons of injecting EntityManagerFactory vs EntityManager are all spelled out in the Spring docs here, I'm not sure if I can improve on that.
Saying that, there are some points in your question that should be cleared up.
...Spring would create a new instance of a DAO for every web request...
This is not correct. If your DAO is a Spring bean, then it's a singleton, unless you configure it otherwise via the scope attribute in the bean definition. Instantiating a DAO for every request would be crazy.
The argument for injecting EMF is that its a good practice over all its always good to have a handle to a factory.
This argument doesn't really hold water. General good practice says that an object should be injected with the minimum collaborators it needs to do its job.