What is the difference between the two? Both seem to mean that the value may be null and should be dealt with accordingly i.e. checked for null.
Update: The two annotations above are part of JSR-305/FindBugs: http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/manual/annotations.html
I think it is pretty clear from the link you added: if you use @CheckForNull
and the code that uses the value does not check for null
, FindBugs will show it as an error.
FindBugs will ignore @Nullable
.
In practice this annotation is useful only for overriding an overarching
NonNull
annotation.
Use @CheckForNull
in the cases when the value must always be checked. Use @Nullable
where null
might be OK.
EDIT: it seems that @CheckForNull
is not well supported at the moment, so I suggest avoiding it and using @NonNull
(also see Which @NotNull Java annotation should I use?).
Another idea would be to get in touch directly with the FindBugs developers, and ask their opinion about the inconsistency in the documentation.