Real world comparisons of Glassfish and JBoss 5?

java jboss glassfish java-ee-5
jsight picture jsight · Aug 4, 2009 · Viewed 15.4k times · Source

Does anyone have experiences with both in the real world? How do they compare in terms of performance (memory usage, speed, etc)? Stability?

Does JBoss Seam work well on Glassfish?

Answer

Piotr Kochański picture Piotr Kochański · Dec 21, 2009

A number of things from my own experience:

  1. GlassFish has much better administration console (JBoss has three consoles, each of them far from being ideal).
  2. Hot deployment is more reliable on GlassFish
  3. JMS works better on GlassFish - this applies to GF vs. JBoss 4.X. As far as I see the JMS implementation was drastically modified in JBoss 5.X, so maybe this claim is no longer true
  4. WebServices are working better on GlassFish, I had a number of issues with more advanced configuration on JBoss
  5. GlassFish has more super-high-end entrprise add-ons, like HA-Database, that stores user session on a cluster in Database, not in memory, so the full failover is possible, whatever disaster would happen
  6. JBoss is more much popular, there are a lot of administrators, developers, who know it, so it is easier to find someone, who can develop on JBoss, there are also more resources in the net. Sometimes this is more important, then technical superiority of one solution over another.
  7. GlassFish is friendlier for developers. Redeployment of the web application on GF 3 lasts more or less one second - in oreder to achieve this kind of speed of redeployment for JBoss I need JRebel. In addition, if someone is using NetBeans, there is a number of smart wizards, that are very helpful.
  8. The future of GlassFish is not certain because of the acquisition of SUN by Oracle. Right now Oracle claims it will support it, but who knows how this support will look like and how long will it last. Even though GlassFish is open source, hardly anyone is ready to develop application server for his/her own needs...

From my point of view GF is easier to administer, is a better solution from purely technological point of view, but it is far less popular and has uncertain future.

I am not connected in any way with RedHat/JBoss or SUN/GlassFish, my company (erudis.pl) is supporting and developing for both servers.

Related questions

What is the difference between Tomcat, JBoss and Glassfish?

I am starting to look into Enterprise Java and the book I am following mentions that it will use JBoss. Netbeans ships with Glassfish. I have used Tomcat in the past. What are the differences between these three programs?

Read More
Would you, at present date, use JBoss or Glassfish (or another) as Java EE server for a new project?

If you started a new Java EE project today which is to be finished in about a year, which application server would you choose and why? Part of your answer should include your arguments for your decision. And also how …

Read More
Why do we use multi application server instances on the same server

I guess there is a good reason, but I don't understand why sometimes we put for example 5 instances having the same webapplications on the same physical server. Has it something to do with an optimisation for a multi processor architecture? …

Read More