I have an app that uses 256-bit AES encryption which is not supported by Java out of the box. I know to get this to function correctly I install the JCE unlimited strength jars in the security folder. This is fine for me being the developer, I can install them.
My question is since this app will be distributed, end users most likely will not have these policy files installed. Having the end user download these just to make the app function is not an attractive solution.
Is there a way to make my app run without overwriting files on the end user machine? A third party software that can handle it without the policy files installed? Or a way to just reference these policy files from within a JAR?
There are a couple of commonly quoted solutions to this problem. Unfortunately neither of these are entirely satisfactory:
But then there's reflection. Is there anything you can't do using reflection?
private static void removeCryptographyRestrictions() {
if (!isRestrictedCryptography()) {
logger.fine("Cryptography restrictions removal not needed");
return;
}
try {
/*
* Do the following, but with reflection to bypass access checks:
*
* JceSecurity.isRestricted = false;
* JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.perms.clear();
* JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.add(CryptoAllPermission.INSTANCE);
*/
final Class<?> jceSecurity = Class.forName("javax.crypto.JceSecurity");
final Class<?> cryptoPermissions = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoPermissions");
final Class<?> cryptoAllPermission = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoAllPermission");
final Field isRestrictedField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("isRestricted");
isRestrictedField.setAccessible(true);
final Field modifiersField = Field.class.getDeclaredField("modifiers");
modifiersField.setAccessible(true);
modifiersField.setInt(isRestrictedField, isRestrictedField.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL);
isRestrictedField.set(null, false);
final Field defaultPolicyField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("defaultPolicy");
defaultPolicyField.setAccessible(true);
final PermissionCollection defaultPolicy = (PermissionCollection) defaultPolicyField.get(null);
final Field perms = cryptoPermissions.getDeclaredField("perms");
perms.setAccessible(true);
((Map<?, ?>) perms.get(defaultPolicy)).clear();
final Field instance = cryptoAllPermission.getDeclaredField("INSTANCE");
instance.setAccessible(true);
defaultPolicy.add((Permission) instance.get(null));
logger.fine("Successfully removed cryptography restrictions");
} catch (final Exception e) {
logger.log(Level.WARNING, "Failed to remove cryptography restrictions", e);
}
}
private static boolean isRestrictedCryptography() {
// This matches Oracle Java 7 and 8, but not Java 9 or OpenJDK.
final String name = System.getProperty("java.runtime.name");
final String ver = System.getProperty("java.version");
return name != null && name.equals("Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment")
&& ver != null && (ver.startsWith("1.7") || ver.startsWith("1.8"));
}
Simply call removeCryptographyRestrictions()
from a static initializer or such before performing any cryptographic operations.
The JceSecurity.isRestricted = false
part is all that is needed to use 256-bit ciphers directly; however, without the two other operations, Cipher.getMaxAllowedKeyLength()
will still keep reporting 128, and 256-bit TLS cipher suites won't work.
This code works on Oracle Java 7 and 8, and automatically skips the process on Java 9 and OpenJDK where it's not needed. Being an ugly hack after all, it likely doesn't work on other vendors' VMs.
It also doesn't work on Oracle Java 6, because the private JCE classes are obfuscated there. The obfuscation does not change from version to version though, so it is still technically possible to support Java 6.