I have several CompletionStage
methods that I'd like to chain. The problem is that the result of the first one will determine if the next ones should be executed. Right now the only way to achieve this seems to be passing "special" arguments to next CompletionStage
so it doesn't execute the full code. For example:
public enum SomeResult {
RESULT_1,
RESULT_2,
RESULT_3
}
public CompletionStage<SomeResult> someMethod(SomeArgument someArgument) {
return CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> {
// loooooong operation
if (someCondition)
return validValue;
else
return null;
}).thenCompose(result -> {
if (result != null)
return someMethodThatReturnsACompletionStage(result);
else
return CompletableFuture.completedFuture(null);
}).thenApply(result -> {
if (result == null)
return ChainingResult.RESULT_1;
else if (result.someCondition())
return ChainingResult.RESULT_2;
else
return ChainingResult.RESULT_3;
});
}
Since the whole code depends on the first someCondition
(if it's false
then the result will be RESULT_1
, if not then the whole code should be executed) this construction looks a bit ugly to me. Is there any way to decide if 2nd (thenCompose(...)
) and 3rd (thenApply(...)
) methods should be executed?
You can do it like this:
public CompletionStage<SomeResult> someMethod(SomeArgument someArgument) {
CompletableFuture<SomeResult> shortCut = new CompletableFuture<>();
CompletableFuture<ResultOfFirstOp> withChain = new CompletableFuture<>();
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> {
// loooooong operation
if (someCondition)
withChain.complete(validValue);
else
shortCut.complete(SomeResult.RESULT_1);
});
return withChain
.thenCompose(result -> someMethodThatReturnsACompletionStage(result))
.thenApply(result ->
result.someCondition()? SomeResult.RESULT_2: SomeResult.RESULT_3)
.applyToEither(shortCut, Function.identity());
}
Instead of one CompletableFuture
we create two, representing the different execution paths we might take. The loooooong operation is submitted as runnable then and will deliberately complete one of these CompletableFuture
. The followup stages are chained to the stage representing the fulfilled condition, then both execution paths join at the last applyToEither(shortCut, Function.identity())
step.
The shortCut
future has already the type of the final result and will be completed with the RESULT_1
, the result of your null
passing path, which will cause the immediate completion of the entire operation. If you don’t like the dependency between the first stage and the actual result value of the short-cut, you can retract it like this:
public CompletionStage<SomeResult> someMethod(SomeArgument someArgument) {
CompletableFuture<Object> shortCut = new CompletableFuture<>();
CompletableFuture<ResultOfFirstOp> withChain = new CompletableFuture<>();
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> {
// loooooong operation
if (someCondition)
withChain.complete(validValue);
else
shortCut.complete(null);
});
return withChain
.thenCompose(result -> someMethodThatReturnsACompletionStage(result))
.thenApply(result ->
result.someCondition()? SomeResult.RESULT_2: SomeResult.RESULT_3)
.applyToEither(shortCut.thenApply(x -> SomeResult.RESULT_1), Function.identity());
}
If your third step wasn’t exemplary but looks exactly like shown in the question, you could merge it with the code path joining step:
public CompletionStage<SomeResult> someMethod(SomeArgument someArgument) {
CompletableFuture<ResultOfSecondOp> shortCut = new CompletableFuture<>();
CompletableFuture<ResultOfFirstOp> withChain = new CompletableFuture<>();
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> {
// loooooong operation
if (someCondition)
withChain.complete(validValue);
else
shortCut.complete(null);
});
return withChain
.thenCompose(result -> someMethodThatReturnsACompletionStage(result))
.applyToEither(shortCut, result -> result==null? SomeResult.RESULT_1:
result.someCondition()? SomeResult.RESULT_2: SomeResult.RESULT_3);
}
then we only skip the second step, the someMethodThatReturnsACompletionStage
invocation, but that can still stand for a long chain of intermediate steps, all skipped without the need to roll out a manual skipping via nullcheck.