What is the difference between JMS consumer and Message Driven Beans (MDB)

jakarta-ee ejb jms java-ee-5 message-driven-bean
robin bajaj picture robin bajaj · Apr 13, 2011 · Viewed 9.1k times · Source

Is there any difference between an asynchronous JMS (Java Messaging Service) consumer vs an actual MDB (Message Driven Bean). The only difference I see is the MDB class has @MessageDriven annotation which the asynchronous JMS consumer doesn't.

Anything else that I am missing ?

Answer

anubhava picture anubhava · Apr 13, 2011

Your MDB works as JMS consumer in your case. MDB is EJB specific term and consumer is a JMS term. A JMS consumer can be a message driven POJO as well which is not technically an EJB.

Answers to comments

A1. Yes it is correct to say that a plain JMS consumer cannot be pooled/managed like an EJB unless that JMS consumer happens to be managed by containers like EJB or Spring containers.

A2. MDBs really just fulfills the requirement for asynchronous communication with EJBs. When they are JMS based then your MDB is technically a JMS Consumer as well. But an MDB can be non-JMS based as well eg: JCA (Java Connector Architecture) based MDB. You can see this post for more details about non-JMS based MDB: http://debupanda.blogspot.com/2006/08/using-ejb-30-message-driven-bean-with.html

Related questions

Difference between MDB and JMS

Please let me know what is the difference between: Message Driven Beans (MDB) Java Message Service (JMS)

Read More
Should I use @EJB or @Inject

I have found this question: What is the difference between @Inject and @EJB but I did not get any wiser. I have not done Java EE before nor do I have experience with dependency injection so I do not understand …

Read More
Stateless and Stateful Enterprise Java Beans

I am going through the Java EE 6 tutorial and I am trying to understand the difference between stateless and stateful session beans. If stateless session beans do not retain their state in between method calls, why is my program acting …

Read More