Test case:
NSLog(@"%f", M_PI);
NSLog(@"%@", [NSString stringWithFormat:@"%f", M_PI]);
NSLog(@"%@", [NSNumber numberWithDouble:M_PI]);
Results:
3.141593
3.141593
3.141592653589793
Conclusions:
1) Printing via NSLog() or [NSString stringWithFormat] provide a very low precision...
2) Printing via [NSNumber numberWithDouble] provides a better precision...
I would have expected to get a result much closer to the original value: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288 (as defined in math.h)
Any clues?
The first two lines round to 6 decimals because that's the default rounding length for printf
inherited from C.
The third line displays the data with the maximum useful precision - an IEEE 754 64bit floating-point number has slightly less than 16 decimal digits of precision, so all those digits of the literal in math.h
are pointless (perhaps they can be seen as future-proofing against a possible future redefinition in a format with more precision).