Is it considered bad practice to perform HTTP POST without entity body?

http rest post
Suresh Kumar picture Suresh Kumar · Nov 16, 2010 · Viewed 83.3k times · Source

I need to invoke a process which doesn't require any input from the user, just a trigger. I plan to use POST /uri without a body to trigger the process. I want to know if this is considered bad from both HTTP and REST perspectives?

Answer

Darrel Miller picture Darrel Miller · Nov 17, 2010

I asked this question on the IETF HTTP working group a few months ago. The short answer is: NO, it's not a bad practice (but I suggest reading the thread for more details).

Related questions

PUT vs. POST in REST

According to the HTTP/1.1 Spec: The POST method is used to request that the origin server accept the entity enclosed in the request as a new subordinate of the resource identified by the Request-URI in the Request-Line In other words, …

Read More
What's the difference between "Request Payload" vs "Form Data" as seen in Chrome dev tools Network tab

I have an old web application I have to support (which I did not write). When I fill out a form and submit then check the "Network" tab in Chrome I see "Request Payload" where I would normally see "Form …

Read More
What REST PUT/POST/DELETE calls should return by a convention?

According to the "REST ideology" what should be in the response body for a PUT/POST/DELETE requests? What about return codes? Is HTTP_OK enough? What is the reason for such conventions, if any? I've found a good post …

Read More