Pixels vs. Points in HTML/CSS
When creating an HTML page, should I specify things like margins with pixels or with points in CSS?
Is one of them considered to be better practice than the other? Any advantages or disadvantages to either one?
Answer
Use px or em
Points (pt): Points are traditionally used in print media (anything that is to be printed on paper, etc.). One point is equal to 1/72 of an inch. Points are much like pixels, in that they are fixed-size units and cannot scale in size.
Generally, 1em = 12pt = 16px = 100%.
[Conclusion]
The winner: percent (%).
- JohnB note: this is for TEXT. Obviously you asked about "things like margins." (I assume you mean
paddingalso.) For that, I would recommendpxorem. Personally, I switch, depending on the particular situation.
MORE ARTICLES
Point values are only for print CSS!
(Comment further down)
Points are for print? Nope.
Points are not for print exclusively. Theoretically, points are for defining an absolute measure. Pixels are not absolute, since depending on your screen and chosen definition (not resolution), the resolution (pixels per inch) can go from a lot (150dpi) or very little (75dpi). Which means your pixels can be a size, or maybe half that size. Which means that text you design to be perfectly legible on your screen may look too big on your client’s screen (“please make the text smaller, ok?”) or too small to be readable on your neighbor’s screen (“hey, the website you told me about the other day? the one you said you had worked on… well i couldn’t read the text very well, it’s so small”).
Points are a solution to this issue. But browsers and operating systems need to manage those. Basically, it means:
browsers have to calculate the display size in pixels using the given value (say, 10pt) and the screen’s real resolution; operating systems have to communicate the real current resolution, and not a default value.
Also: