How to keep the local file or the remote file during merge using Git and the command line?

git merge local
e-satis picture e-satis · Jul 11, 2011 · Viewed 122k times · Source

I know how to merge modification using vimdiff, but, assuming I just know that the entire file is good to keep or to throw away, how do I do that?

I don't want to open vimdiff for each of them, I change want a command that says 'keep local' or 'keep remote'.

E.G: I got a merge with files marked as changed because somebody opened it under windows, changing the EOL, and then commited. When merging, I want to just keep my own version and discard his.

I'm also interested in the contrary: I screwed up big time and want to accept the remote file, discarding my changes.

Answer

Waiting for Dev... picture Waiting for Dev... · Aug 19, 2012

You can as well do:

git checkout --theirs /path/to/file

to keep the remote file, and:

git checkout --ours /path/to/file

to keep local file.

Then git add them and everything is done.

Edition: Keep in mind that this is for a merge scenario. During a rebase --theirs refers to the branch where you've been working.

Related questions

Git pull a certain branch from GitHub

I have a project with multiple branches. I've been pushing them to GitHub, and now that someone else is working on the project I need to pull their branches from GitHub. It works fine in master. But say that someone …

Read More
How to merge a specific commit in Git

I have forked a branch from a repository in GitHub and committed something specific to me. Now I found the original repository had a good feature which was at HEAD. I want to merge it only without previous commits. What …

Read More
How to replace master branch in Git, entirely, from another branch?

I have two branches in my Git repository: master seotweaks (created originally from master) I created seotweaks with the intention of quickly merging it back into master. However, that was three months ago and the code in this branch is 13 …

Read More