MVC3 and Code First Migrations - "model backing the 'blah' context has changed since the database was created"

entity-framework asp.net-mvc-3 entity-framework-migrations
Scott Dietrich picture Scott Dietrich · Apr 21, 2012 · Viewed 32.6k times · Source

I started off my project by using Entity Framework Code First. When I was ready I uploaded my database and code to my host provider. Everything worked.

I need to add a new field to one of my classes and I don't want to loose the data in the database. Thus, I tried following some blog posts about using Code First Migrations. I did the following:

  1. I backed up my remote (production) database.
  2. I attached this database locally
  3. I added the property to my class
  4. PM> Enable-Migrations
  5. PM> Add-Migration AddSortOrderToCar
  6. PM> Update-Database
  7. At this point I created a .bak file of the local database and then used that file to 'restore' to the remote one.
  8. Lastly, I published the code to the remote site.

When I visit the site I get the following error message: The model backing the 'blahblah' context has changed since the database was created. Consider using Code First Migrations to update the database.

What am I doing wrong?

Answer

NSGaga-mostly-inactive picture NSGaga-mostly-inactive · Apr 21, 2012

From my experience that suggests that migration table is out of sync (even if your data isn't), and that's been part of the db schema now (since 4.3 I think - under system tables).

There could be many reasons and ways to experience that error , but most of the time...

The problematic part is some combination of manually backing/restoring the full database with code changes alongside - I'm not entirely certain as to why always.

In short, even if Db-s are the same migration table data might not be - and hash comparison may fail (still full restore sounds like good enough - but you have 'two sides').

What works for me is to use
Update-Database -Script

That creates a script with a 'migration difference',
which you can manually apply as an SQL script on the target server database (and you should get the right migration table rows inserted etc.).

If that still doesn't work - you can still do two things...

  1. Remove the migration table (target - under system tables) - as per http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2012/02/09/ef-4-3-automatic-migrations-walkthrough.aspx comments in there - that should fail back to previous behavior and if you're certain that your Db-s are the same - it's just going to 'trust you',

  2. As a last resort I used - make a Update-Database -Script of the full schema (e.g. by initializing an empty db which should force a 'full script'),
    find the INSERT INTO [__MigrationHistory] records,
    just run those, insert them into the database,
    and make sure that your databases - and code match,

that should make things run in sync again.

(disclaimer: this is not a bullet proof to work at all times, you may need to try a few things given your local scenarios - but should get you in sync)

Related questions

The type or namespace name 'DbContext' could not be found

I am VERY new to ASP.NET MVC (3) and am having a hard time resolving a build error in Visual Studio: The type or namespace name 'DbContext' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly …

Read More
Non-static method requires a target

I have a controller action that works fine on Firefox both locally and in production, and IE locally, but not IE in production. Here is my controller action: public ActionResult MNPurchase() { CalculationViewModel calculationViewModel = (CalculationViewModel)TempData["calculationViewModel"]; decimal OP = landTitleUnitOfWork.Sales.…

Read More
EF LINQ include multiple and nested entities

Ok, I have tri-leveled entities with the following hierarchy: Course -> Module -> Chapter Here was the original EF LINQ statement: Course course = db.Courses .Include(i => i.Modules.Select(s => s.Chapters)) .Single(x => …

Read More