I'm currently using JSDoc Toolkit to document my code, but it doesn't quite fit - namely, it seem to struggle with describing namespaces properly. Say you have two simple classes in each their files:
lib/database/foo.js
:
/** @class */
function Foo(...) {...}
/** @function ... */
Foo.prototype.init(..., cb) { return cb(null, ...); };
module.exports = foo;
And then something inherited lib/database/bar.js
:
var Foo = require('./foo');
/**
* @class
* @augments Foo
*/
function Bar(....) {...}
util.inherits(Bar, Foo);
Bar.prototype.moreInit(..., cb) { return cb(null, ...); };
In the generated documentation, this is output simply as Foo
and Bar
, without the leading database
(or lib.database
), which are quite necessary when you don't have everything in a global scope.
I've tried throwing @namespace database
and @name database.Foo
at it, but it doesn't turn out nice.
Any ideas for making JSDoc output something more suitable, or some entirely different tool that works better with Node.js? (I looked briefly at Natural Docs, JSDuck and breezed over quite a few others that looked quite obsolete...)
JSDoc is a port of JavaDoc. So basically the documentation assumes classical OOP and that's not suited to JavaScript.
Personally I would recommend using docco to annotate your source code. Examples of it can be found for underscore, backbone, docco.
A good alternative to docco is groc
As for an actual API documentation, I personally find auto generated documentation from comments just does not work for JavaScript and recommend you hand-write your API documentation.
Examples would be underscore API, Express API, nodejs API, socket.io docs
Similar StackOverFlow questions