I've been transferring some projects that have been executing on the same machine to individual dockers each. I've tried to use pm2
on one of these docker projects to make sure the service would restart if something go wrong (it's a volatile project) and some of the examples demands the Dockerfile to use pm2-runtime
instead of pm2
. I've been searching for the differences of these two but I couldn't find something specific, could someone help?
The main difference between pm2 and pm2-runtime is
In simple words, the life of the container is the life of CMD
or entrypoint
.
For example
Dockerfile
FROM node:alpine
RUN npm install pm2 -g
COPY . /app
WORKDIR /app
CMD [ "pm2", "start","/app/server.js"]
In this case, the container will die as soon as it run the process.
To deal with this, you have pm2-runtime
FROM node:alpine
RUN npm install pm2 -g
COPY . /app
WORKDIR /app
ENV NODE_ENV=development
CMD [ "pm2-runtime", "start","/app/bin/www"]
As the container keeps running and it allocates tty session.
From the documentation
The goal of pm2-runtime is to wrap your applications into a proper Node.js production environment. It solves major issues when running Node.js applications inside a container like:
Second Process Fallback for High Application Reliability Process Flow Control Automatic Application Monitoring to keep it always sane and high performing Automatic Source Map Discovery and Resolving Support Further than that, using PM2 as a layer between the container and the application brings PM2 powerful features like application declaration file, customizable log system and other great features to manage your Node.js application in production environment.