Is there benefit to using Monit instead of a basic Upstart setup?

Question

I'm configuring my server to run node.js as a daemon. I've setup Upstart to handle startup and shutdown of node, which works wonderfully. The next step is to make sure that node.js is restarted if it dies. A few of the guides have suggested using Monit (or Fugue) to monitor the process (in Monit's case by doing an HTTP request to the server and waiting for a response).

I'm happy to use something like Monit or Fugue, but I'm not sure why one wouldn't (or couldn't) just use Upstart's respawn feature. I assume Upstart will monitor the PID of the launched process and just kick it off again if it dies. What does Monit or Fugue give you that Upstart doesn't?

Answer 1

I highly recommend using both Monit AND upstart. Upstart makes it easy to deamonize node.js and Monit comes packed with tons of useful app checks including memory usage, http requests, cpu usage, ...

This is an example of the most basic setup you can get. You could also easily add another monit config (with the same start and stop script) but using the PID file and monitoring process stats.

For the below configuration create a simple local-only request handler in your app that just responds with status 200 if all is well.

Monit config:

check host app_name with address 127.0.0.1
    start "/sbin/start app_name"
    stop "/sbin/stop app_name"
    if failed port 80 protocol HTTP
        request /ok
        with timeout 5 seconds
        then restart

Upstart script (/etc/init/app_name):

description "app_name"

start on startup
stop on shutdown

script
    # Node needs HOME to be set
    export HOME="path/to/node/app"

    exec sudo -u nodejs /usr/local/bin/node path/to/node/app/server.js production 2>>/var/log/app_name.error.log >>/var/log/app_name.log
end script