I just finally got used to not having any Used undeclared or Unused declared dependencies in my projects. Although it is very hard to track Unused declared runtime/test dependencies that are listed in dependency:analyze... One just must write comments to them in pom.xml or otherwise manage them to know that they are needed for testing or runtime.
But the way of resolving version conflict is still unclear to me. Regarding transitive dependencies.
How does the nearest-wins strategy work exactly? When is one version used over another version ?
If you declare the Used undeclared dependency with a version number - it always wins
If one doesn't specify dependency version explicitly, Maven cannot resolve any version conflicts that may arise regarding this dependency (weird, but written here)
If you don't declare Undeclared used dependency, it chooses a transitive dependency from the closest level (nearest-wins strategy) and if the conflict is on the same level then it somehow decides between version A over version B ... Maybe the first one it comes to when processing the depenencies wins
I think the dependency resolution works the exact same way you described.
I also think your life would be much easier if you use the <scope>
child tag to your <dependency>
as quoted from the maven official website: