LESS CSS nesting classes

newbie_86 picture newbie_86 · Feb 25, 2011 · Viewed 76.5k times · Source

I'm using LESS to improve my CSS and am trying to nest a class within a class. There's a fairly complicated hierarchy but for some reason my nesting doesn't work. I have this:

.g {
    float: left;
    color: #323a13;
    .border(1px,#afc945);
    .gradient(#afc945, #c8da64);
    .common;
    span {
        .my-span;
        .border-dashed(1px,rgba(255,255,255,0.3));
    }
    .posted {
         .my-posted;
         span {
            border: none;
         }
    }
}

I can't get the .g.posted to work. it just shows the .g bit. If i do this it's fine:

.g {
    float: left;
    color: #323a13;
    .border(1px,#afc945);
    .gradient(#afc945, #c8da64);
    .common;
    span {
        .my-span;
        .border-dashed(1px,rgba(255,255,255,0.3));
    }
}

.g.posted {
         .my-posted;
         span {
            border: none;
         }
    }

I'd like to nest the .posted in .g though. Any ideas?

Answer

mingos picture mingos · Feb 25, 2011

The & character has the function of a this keyword, actually (a thing I did not know at the moment of writing the answer). It is possible to write:

.class1 {
    &.class2 {}
}

and the CSS that will be generated will look like this:

.class1.class2 {}

For the record, @grobitto was the first to post this piece of information.


[ORIGINAL ANSWER]

LESS doesn't work this way.

.class1.class2 {} - defines two classes on the same DOM node, but

.class1 {
    .class2 {}
}

defines nested nodes. .class2 will only be applied if it is a child of a node with the class class1.

I've been confused with this too and my conclusion is that LESS needs a this keyword :).