I have recently struggled with achieving smooth Google Web Fonts, primarily on Windows Google Chrome.
I had previously been using the direct stylesheet code, ripped from the URL that Google Web Fonts supplies, eg., Google supplies:
<link href='http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Titillium+Web:200' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css'>
So I go to the URL and use the following code
@font-face {
font-family: 'Titillium Web';
font-style: normal;
font-weight: 200;
src: local('Titillium WebThin'), local('TitilliumWeb-Thin'), url(http://themes.googleusercontent.com/static/fonts/titilliumweb/v1/anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr-K9kSItTeDn2USN0q77Oh4.woff) format('woff');
}
I figured this was a cheeky way to save a little more speed rather than making a request to Google, which then appears to make another request to source the font.
I recently discovered that this was the cause of the rendering issues (see the following example for how the Windows Chrome browser renders on the Web Font page, compared to a test page I created using the process: http://imgur.com/OV2U1,ema2B)
My question is, why does the <link /> version make the font smooth, when it is sourcing the same font with my shorthand method? And also, is there any reason why I should be using this approach, which I figured would cut request times?
There are a few issues that may answer your question. The main one is that the linked URL actually displays different CSS for different browsers. So if you open it in Chrome and copy that CSS then it may not work in Internet Explorer (particularly pre version 9).
Also, you are using a font weight of 200, which is a "light" weight. The default of regular text is 400. So there is a small chance that certain browsers simply don't show the font unless you specify a font weight of 200. Something like this should help:
body {
font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif;
font-weight: 200;
}