CQRS without Event Sourcing - what are the drawbacks?
Besides missing some of the benefits of Event Sourcing, are there any other drawbacks to adapting an existing architecture to CQRS without the Event Sourcing piece?
I'm working on large application and the developers should be able to handle separating the existing architecture into Commands and Queries over the next few months, but asking them to also add in the Event Sourcing at this stage would be a HUGE problem from a resourcing perspective. Am I committing sacrilege by not including Event Sourcing?
Answer
Event Sourcing is optional and in most cases complicates things more than it helps if introduced too early. Especially when transitioning from a legacy architecture and even more when the team has no experience with CQRS.
Most of the advantages being attributed to ES can be obtained by storing your events in a simple Event Log. You don't have to drop your state-based persistence, (but in the long run you probably will, because at some point it will become the logical next step).
My recommendation: Simplicity is the key. Do one step at a time, especially when introducing such a dramatic paradigm shift. Start with simple CQRS, then introduce an Event Log when you (and your team) have become used to the new concepts. Then, if at all required, change your persistence to Event Sourcing and fire the DBA ;-)