I'm interested in putting an opening brace for functions (but not if statements and other contexts). For example
void foo()
{
...
}
Flamewars aside, is there a good rationale for not doing this? Although I use same-line open-brackets for if/else and smaller blocks, I think in this case visual organization of larger units of code (functions/methods/classes/structs) can trump perfect consistency.
Moreover, how do I get clang-format to follow this style?
As the documentation says, invoke clang-format
with -style=file
, and use a .clang-format
file placed in an enclosing directory to customize style options. The format style option specifying brace placement is called BreakBeforeBraces
. From the docs,
BreakBeforeBraces (
BraceBreakingStyle
)The brace breaking style to use.
Possible values:
BS_Attach
(in configuration:Attach
) Always attach braces to surrounding context.BS_Linux
(in configuration:Linux
) LikeAttach
, but break before braces on function, namespace and class definitions.BS_Stroustrup
(in configuration:Stroustrup
) LikeAttach
, but break before function definitions, and ‘else’.BS_Allman
(in configuration:Allman
) Always break before braces.BS_GNU
(in configuration:GNU
) Always break before braces and add an extra level of indentation to braces of control statements, not to those of class, function or other definitions.
The style that matches your description is BS_Stroustrup
. Add the following entry to your .clang-format
BreakBeforeBraces: Stroustrup
In addition to the docs, clangformat.com lists all the options and illustrates many of them with examples.