I'm trying to replace some macro subroutines with inline functions, so the compiler can optimize them, so the debugger can step into them, etc. If I define them as normal functions it works:
void do_something(void)
{
blah;
}
void main(void)
{
do_something();
}
but if I define them as inline:
inline void do_something(void)
{
blah;
}
void main(void)
{
do_something();
}
it says "Error: Undefined external". What does that mean? Taking a stab in the dark, I tried
static inline void do_something(void)
{
blah;
}
void main(void)
{
do_something();
}
and no more errors. The function definition and call to the function are in the same .c file.
Can someone explain why one works and the other doesn't?
(Second related question: Where do I put inline functions if I want to use them in more than one .c file?)
First, the compiler does not always inline functions marked as inline
; eg if you turn all optimizations off it will probably not inline them.
When you define an inline function
inline void do_something(void)
{
blah
}
and use that function, even in the same file, the call to that function is resolved by the linker not the compiler, because it is implicitely "extern". But this definition alone does not provide an external definition of the function.
If you include a declaration without inline
void do_something(void);
in a C file which can see the inline
definition, the compiler will provide an external definition of the function, and the error should go away.
The reason static inline
works is that it makes the function visible only within that compilatioin unit, and so allows the compiler to resolve the call to the function (and optimize it) and emit the code for the function within that compilation unit. The linker then doesn't have to resolve it, so there is no need for an external definition.
The best place to put inline function is in a header file, and declare them static inline
. This removes any need for an external definition, so it resolves the linker problem. However, this causes the compiler to emit the code for the function in every compilation unit that uses it, so could result in code bloat. But since the function is inline, it is probably small anyway, so this usually isn't a problem.
The other option is to define it as extern inline
in the header, and in one C file provide and extern
declaration without the inline
modifier.
The gcc manual explains it thus:
By declaring a function inline, you can direct GCC to make calls to that function faster. One way GCC can achieve this is to integrate that function's code into the code for its callers. This makes execution faster by eliminating the function-call overhead; in addition, if any of the actual argument values are constant, their known values may permit simplifications at compile time so that not all of the inline function's code needs to be included. The effect on code size is less predictable; object code may be larger or smaller with function inlining, depending on the particular case. You can also direct GCC to try to integrate all "simple enough" functions into their callers with the option
-finline-functions
.GCC implements three different semantics of declaring a function inline. One is available with
-std=gnu89
or-fgnu89-inline
or whengnu_inline
attribute is present on all inline declarations, another when-std=c99
,-std=c1x
,-std=gnu99
or-std=gnu1x
(without-fgnu89-inline
), and the third is used when compiling C++.To declare a function inline, use the
inline
keyword in its declaration, like this:static inline int inc (int *a) { return (*a)++; }
If you are writing a header file to be included in ISO C90 programs, write
__inline__
instead ofinline
.The three types of inlining behave similarly in two important cases: when the
inline
keyword is used on astatic
function, like the example above, and when a function is first declared without using theinline
keyword and then is defined withinline
, like this:extern int inc (int *a); inline int inc (int *a) { return (*a)++; }
In both of these common cases, the program behaves the same as if you had not used the
inline
keyword, except for its speed.When a function is both inline and
static
, if all calls to the function are integrated into the caller, and the function's address is never used, then the function's own assembler code is never referenced. In this case, GCC does not actually output assembler code for the function, unless you specify the option-fkeep-inline-functions
. Some calls cannot be integrated for various reasons (in particular, calls that precede the function's definition cannot be integrated, and neither can recursive calls within the definition). If there is a nonintegrated call, then the function is compiled to assembler code as usual. The function must also be compiled as usual if the program refers to its address, because that can't be inlined.Note that certain usages in a function definition can make it unsuitable for inline substitution. Among these usages are: use of varargs, use of alloca, use of variable sized data types , use of computed goto, use of nonlocal goto, and nested functions. Using
-Winline
will warn when a function markedinline
could not be substituted, and will give the reason for the failure.As required by ISO C++, GCC considers member functions defined within the body of a class to be marked inline even if they are not explicitly declared with the
inline
keyword. You can override this with-fno-default-inline
.GCC does not inline any functions when not optimizing unless you specify the
always_inline
attribute for the function, like this:/* Prototype. */ inline void foo (const char) __attribute__((always_inline));
The remainder of this section is specific to GNU C90 inlining.
When an inline function is not
static
, then the compiler must assume that there may be calls from other source files; since a global symbol can be defined only once in any program, the function must not be defined in the other source files, so the calls therein cannot be integrated. Therefore, a non-static
inline function is always compiled on its own in the usual fashion.If you specify both
inline
andextern
in the function definition, then the definition is used only for inlining. In no case is the function compiled on its own, not even if you refer to its address explicitly. Such an address becomes an external reference, as if you had only declared the function, and had not defined it.This combination of
inline
andextern
has almost the effect of a macro. The way to use it is to put a function definition in a header file with these keywords, and put another copy of the definition (lackinginline
andextern
) in a library file. The definition in the header file will cause most calls to the function to be inlined. If any uses of the function remain, they will refer to the single copy in the library.