Alternatives to Autoconf and Autotools?

Tim Post picture Tim Post · Mar 1, 2009 · Viewed 21k times · Source

I'm a very frequent user of the GNU Autotools (mostly Autoconf, occasionally Libtool). I'm working on a project where portability is going to be a sticking point.. Yet, the rest of the team is just not comfortable working with m4. I got this in my inbox from not one, but four people:

m4 is NOT lisp, dammit!

Anyway, perhaps someone could recommend something Python or PHP based? I'm working on the C end of a much larger tree; I can be sure either Python or PHP 5 will be present, as they are prerequisites.

Answer

Artyom picture Artyom · Jul 13, 2009

I'm taking the chance of being downvoted but, I must admit, that unfortunately there is no real substitute for autotools. CMake, SCons, bjam are nice but, when it comes to serious work... it is quite clear that autotools are superior, not because CMake can't do the same thing, but because it is just much harder to do so with it.

For example, CMake, the most popular alternative to autotools, has the following drawbacks:

  • No support of gettext. This may be a real problem when you need to manage a lot of translations and translated source code.
  • No support for an uninstall target. It is quite unpleasant to find out that you can't uninstall the program you installed.
  • No automatic build of both shared and static libraries.
  • Documentation is very limited and bad.

And so on.

There are many other points. Unfortunately, there is no real high quality substitute for autotools. On the other hand, if you develop on Windows and for Visual Studio, then you can't use autotools and you need to choose CMake that provides such tools.