someone i know encountered a problem when running 'lmutil
' so i asked them to strace -f lmutil
. Why is execve
failing with "No such file"!!! It makes no sense, since I am straceing the very same file!! What exactly is going on here???
strace -f /home/tabitha/Starprogram/FLEXlm_11.7/linux-x86_64-2.3.4/bin/lmutil
Output:
execve("/home/tabitha/Starprogram/FLEXlm_11.7/linux-x86_64-2.3.4/bin/lmutil", ["/home/tabitha/Starprogram/FLEXlm"...], [/* 38 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
dup(2) = 3
fcntl(3, F_GETFL) = 0x8002 (flags O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE)
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 1), ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7fd7cb8b0000
lseek(3, 0, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek)
write(3, "strace: exec: No such file or di"..., 40strace: exec: No such file or directory
) = 40
close(3) = 0
munmap(0x7fd7cb8b0000, 4096) = 0
exit_group(1) = ?
ldd output
$ ldd ./lmutil linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffcd5ff000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fe40ebbe000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007fe40e93b000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fe40e724000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007fe40e3a1000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fe40e19d000) /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fe40edf5000)
$ find . -name lmutil -exec file {} \; ./bin.linux.x86_64/lmutil: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, stripped ./bin.linux.x86/lmutil: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, stripped ./lmutil: Bourne shell script text executable
The file you're trying to execute (…/lmutil
) exists but its “loader” doesn't exist, where
/lib/ld-linux.so.2
;/bin/sh
if the script begins with #!/bin/sh
.From the name of the directory, there's a good chance that lmutil
is an amd64 Linux binary, looking for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
as its loader, but you have an amd64 Linux kernel running a 386 (i.e. 32-bit) userland. You need to get suitable binaries for your platform.
I consider this situation to be Unix's most misleading error message. Unfortunately fixing it would be hard: the kernel can only report a numeric error code to the caller of the program, so it only has room for “command not found” (ENOENT
) and not for the name of the loader it's looking for. This is one of these rare cases where strace
doesn't help.